Alright, so National Geographic DE... it's a mixed bag. On the one hand, you're getting National Geographic level photography, which, let's be honest, is statistically satisfying. The articles are generally well-written, and it's a step up from doomscrolling Twitter. But here's the thing, as a data analyst, the UI/UX feels a bit clunky. It's not *bad*, but it's not exactly optimized for quick information consumption. I'd love to see some analytics on how users actually *use* the app. Are they reading cover-to-cover? Skimming? What articles get the most views? That data could drive some serious improvements. Still, if you're looking for a curated source of nature and science content, and you're willing to forgive some interface quirks, it's worth a look. Think of it like Tableau... but for nature magazines. Just don't expect exports to CSV in under 10 seconds.
Key Features
High-quality nature photography
Science and nature reporting
Offline reading (if you can download before it crashes)
"MΓΌll. StΓΌrzt dauernd ab (Rubbish. Constantly crashes)"
β 5β User Review
IOSUpdated: 7/9/2025