IMDb offers comprehensive movie and TV data, including ratings, reviews, and cast information, while Rotten Tomatoes focuses primarily on aggregated critic and audience reviews. IMDb boasts significantly more installs, suggesting broader user adoption. Choosing between them depends on your prioritization of comprehensive information versus review aggregation.
IMDb
Fandango
IMDb offers comprehensive movie and TV data, including ratings, reviews, and cast information, while Rotten Tomatoes focuses primarily on aggregated critic and audience reviews. IMDb boasts significantly more installs, suggesting broader user adoption. Choosing between them depends on your prioritization of comprehensive information versus review aggregation.
IMDb emphasizes a broader range of information, including cast, crew, trivia, and news, while Rotten Tomatoes concentrates on critical consensus and audience scores. IMDb has significantly higher user adoption based on install numbers.
Users seeking a complete database of movie and TV information should opt for IMDb. Users primarily interested in aggregated critical and audience reviews to inform viewing decisions may prefer Rotten Tomatoes.
Provides comprehensive movie, TV, and celebrity information, including ratings, reviews, cast, crew, news, and more.
Aggregates critic and audience reviews for movies and TV shows, providing a consensus score.
Detailed cast and crew information, including filmographies and biographies.
Critic and audience ratings with percentage breakdowns.
News and updates related to movies, TV shows, and celebrities.
Review summaries and analysis.
User ratings and reviews.
Ability to sort reviews by various criteria.
Watchlists and tracking of movies and TV shows.
Option to filter movies and TV shows based on ratings and genres.
Integration with other services, such as streaming platforms.
Links to trailers and other movie-related content.
IMDb's extensive content and features justify its value, while Rotten Tomatoes' focus on reviews offers strong value to those prioritizing critical consensus.
IMDb emerges as a slightly better choice due to its broader feature set, higher user base, and generally positive user experience. Rotten Tomatoes remains a strong alternative for review-focused users.
IMDb provides a wider array of features, including news, trivia, and detailed cast/crew information. Rotten Tomatoes focuses primarily on reviews.
Performance can vary based on device and network conditions, but reports suggest both apps generally perform adequately. More detailed performance testing is needed for a definitive comparison.
Both apps are generally well-regarded, but user feedback suggests IMDb's interface might be slightly more intuitive for navigating diverse content.
Analysis based on hundreds of verified user reviews
"I use the app to research actors, watch trailers, and create a watch list. I've also used it to see which services are streaming shows I want to see."
"Representative positive review"
IMDb wins overall due to its more comprehensive feature set, larger user base, and generally positive user experiences. However, Rotten Tomatoes remains a valuable option for users who prioritize aggregated critic and audience reviews.
Users who want a complete database of movie and TV information, including cast, crew, news, and trivia.
Users primarily interested in aggregated critic and audience reviews to inform their viewing decisions.
IMDb wins overall due to its more comprehensive feature set, larger user base, and generally positive user experiences. However, Rotten Tomatoes remains a valuable option for users who prioritize aggregated critic and audience reviews.
Explore more app comparisons and see which apps come out on top!
Explore Battles →