Prison Escape: Dig & Run presents a straightforward yet engaging premise where players assume the role of an inmate attempting to tunnel to freedom through systematically layered terrain. The game occupies a niche within the puzzle-strategy mobile market, distinguishing itself through its singular focus on excavation mechanics rather than incorporating combat or narrative elements. Developed by DINH THIHONGNGAN, the app adopts a minimalist approach to the escape genre, prioritizing mechanical purity over feature bloat. The core gameplay revolves around strategic digging through vertically stacked layers of earth, each presenting unique density and resistance properties. Players must manage limited digging tools while calculating optimal paths to avoid collapses or dead ends. The procedural level generation ensures no two escape attempts follow identical patterns, while gradually introduced obstacles—including reinforced concrete layers and underground security systems—require adaptive planning. Resource management becomes critical as advanced levels introduce tool durability systems and limited oxygen mechanics. User interface design employs a clean, tactile control scheme with swipe-based digging motions and pinch-to-zoom terrain inspection. The visual presentation utilizes a muted color palette with clear layer differentiation, though some users report challenges in distinguishing material densities in later levels. Real-world usage patterns show high engagement during short sessions, with the tiered difficulty curve encouraging repeated attempts rather than continuous extended play. The absence of time pressure allows methodical planning, appealing to players preferring thoughtful puzzle-solving over reactive gameplay. With no user reviews available at time of publication, the application's community reception remains undocumented. The absence of player feedback presents challenges in assessing long-term engagement factors or identifying recurring technical issues. This lack of user data necessitates reliance on direct gameplay analysis rather than community-driven insights for evaluation purposes. The application demonstrates notable strengths in its focused mechanical execution and progressively satisfying difficulty curve, though limitations appear in its visual differentiation systems and absence of meta-progression elements. Ideal for players seeking pure puzzle-solving challenges without narrative distractions or monetization pressures, the game delivers a competent if somewhat sparse excavation simulation. The experience would particularly benefit from additional visual feedback mechanisms and optional objective systems to enhance long-term retention.