Navigate360 Student, developed by EAB Global, Inc, positions itself as a comprehensive campus management solution for iOS users. The application integrates multiple academic functions into a single platform, attempting to reduce the friction students experience when navigating university services and resources. With an overall rating of 2.0 out of 5 stars, the app demonstrates both potential value and significant implementation challenges that merit examination. The core functionality includes six primary features: appointment scheduling with academic staff, task management for academic deadlines, class schedule viewing with calendar synchronization, campus resource directory, study group formation tools, and document management. The appointment system allows direct booking with advisors and faculty, while the resource directory provides mapped locations and contact information for campus services. The study buddy feature attempts to facilitate peer connections, though its implementation appears inconsistent across institutions. User experience varies significantly based on institutional implementation. The interface follows standard iOS design patterns with tab-based navigation, though accessibility issues have been reported. Real-world usage patterns suggest students primarily utilize the class scheduling and resource location features, while advanced functionality like study group formation sees sporadic adoption. Performance appears institution-dependent, with some users reporting seamless integration while others experience functionality gaps. User feedback reveals polarized experiences. Positive reviews from users like Hiram Gumflap (July 8, 2025) highlight effective class location services, while 4everEducated (May 3, 2025) praises the consolidated resource access. However, accessibility concerns emerge prominently, with shoobah an asem (May 1, 2025) reporting D2L integration failures and Voiceover compatibility issues that hinder visually impaired users. The duplicated positive reviews suggest possible review inflation, while consistent accessibility complaints indicate systemic shortcomings. The application demonstrates clear value in centralizing campus resources but suffers from inconsistent implementation across institutions. Strengths include comprehensive feature integration and practical scheduling tools, while limitations involve accessibility gaps and integration reliability. Ideal for students at well-supported institutions, though users with specific accessibility needs or at less-integrated schools may find functionality limited.