Doovix represents an innovative approach to educational technology, positioning itself at the intersection of AI conversation and historical science education. The app utilizes sophisticated language models to simulate interactions with renowned scientific figures, creating what the developer terms a 'Science Time Corridor' experience. This concept addresses a niche in the educational app market by making complex scientific concepts accessible through personalized dialogue rather than traditional instructional methods. The core functionality centers around character-based AI interactions where each historical figure maintains authentic personality traits and knowledge domains. Albert Einstein discusses relativity with appropriate technical depth while maintaining his characteristic philosophical approach, while Marie Curie provides insights into radioactivity with period-appropriate context and terminology. The AI system appears to incorporate substantial historical research into each character's dialogue patterns, theoretical knowledge, and even conversational quirks based on biographical records. Interactions occur through text-based conversations with optional voice synthesis, allowing users to ask questions and receive detailed responses that reflect each scientist's known writings and documented perspectives. User experience demonstrates thoughtful design with an intuitive interface featuring portrait-style character selection, clean conversation threading, and contextual learning aids. The interface employs a minimalist design that prioritizes the conversational experience, with subtle historical imagery and era-appropriate visual elements that enhance immersion without distracting from the educational content. Real-world usage patterns suggest most users engage in 10-15 minute sessions, often using the app as a supplementary learning tool or curiosity-driven exploration platform. The conversation history feature allows users to revisit previous discussions, while the knowledge reinforcement system provides additional context and references for concepts discussed during interactions. With no user reviews currently available, the app's reception remains unverified through third-party validation. The absence of user feedback makes it challenging to assess real-world performance reliability, knowledge accuracy across extended conversations, or potential limitations in character depth. Without independent verification, claims about historical accuracy and educational effectiveness remain based solely on developer assertions rather than demonstrated user experiences. The app demonstrates significant potential for making complex scientific concepts engaging through personalized interaction, though its educational value depends heavily on the AI's accuracy and depth of knowledge representation. Strengths include innovative concept execution and strong character immersion, while limitations involve unverified educational reliability and dependence on AI interpretation of historical perspectives. Ideal use cases include supplementary science education, historical interest exploration, and conceptual learning reinforcement for students and enthusiasts seeking alternative educational formats.