Transact eAccounts serves as a centralized digital platform for campus management, enabling students and staff at participating institutions to handle identification, payments, and access control through their Android devices. The application positions itself as a modern replacement for physical campus cards, integrating with institutional systems to provide a seamless digital experience across campus facilities and services. The core functionality revolves around three primary areas: financial management, digital identification, and access control. Users can monitor account balances in real-time, review transaction histories dating back several months, and add funds using saved payment methods. The Google Wallet integration allows users to store their campus ID digitally, enabling contactless access to buildings, events, and facilities. At supported campuses, the app facilitates payments for various services including dining, laundry, and retail purchases through NFC technology. User experience varies by institution implementation but generally follows Material Design principles with intuitive navigation. The interface organizes features into clear sections: account management, transaction history, and ID management. Performance metrics indicate rapid loading times for balance checks and transaction reviews, though some users report occasional credential timeouts requiring reauthentication. Real-world usage patterns show peak activity during semester beginnings, meal times, and facility access periods, with the app serving as both a financial tool and physical access credential. User feedback highlights generally positive experiences with specific technical considerations. Multiple reviewers including Brian Cole (May 2024) and Ishqair SHUKAIR (February 2024) reported initial difficulties with device migration that were ultimately resolvable through proper credential management. Jordan Brotherton (January 2025) praised the app's speed and Google Wallet integration while noting the absence of WearOS support despite platform compatibility. These reports suggest that while the core functionality performs reliably, device-specific implementation and support responsiveness may vary. The application demonstrates significant strengths in convenience and integration depth but faces limitations in platform consistency and feature parity. Its most compelling value emerges for users at fully-supported campuses where digital ID functionality is enabled, creating a truly wallet-free campus experience. However, institutional variation in feature implementation means user experiences may differ substantially depending on their specific campus's integration level and support resources.