OpenEvidence: Clinical Decision Support

If chat GPT and uptodate had a baby. You still have to check the references obviously, but this is pretty great and accurate so far. Edit: After using for some time, still very useful, but does get things completely wrong about 15% of the time. Especially in subspecialty areas or if you ask leading questions. I learned particularly not to ask yes or no questions because it frequently gives a misleading answer.

If chat GPT and uptodate had a baby. You still have to check the references obviously, but this is pretty great and accurate so far. Edit: After using for some time, still very useful, but does get things completely wrong about 15% of the time. Especially in subspecialty areas or if you ask leading questions. I learned particularly not to ask yes or no questions because it frequently gives a misleading answer.

As an Internist/hospitalist, this is everything I have been waiting for since AI's first took the field with ChatGPT. Answers are complete, accurate, and supported by scientific references. I have been using this often as a point-of-care tool alongside DynaMed (my primary POC resource). Something I would like to see in the future is the ability to earn CME/MOC credits for questions asked, which would be absolutely amazing.

As an Internist/hospitalist, this is everything I have been waiting for since AI's first took the field with ChatGPT. Answers are complete, accurate, and supported by scientific references. I have been using this often as a point-of-care tool alongside DynaMed (my primary POC resource). Something I would like to see in the future is the ability to earn CME/MOC credits for questions asked, which would be absolutely amazing.

Experience so far: The app is as good as the website version of Open Evidence. Unlike Gemini, for example, the responses are not truncated in the app version. Clean layout, easy to read, and of course a very powerful resource at your fingertips.