Boo: Dating. Friends. Chat. represents a distinctive approach to social connection applications, positioning itself as a personality psychology-driven platform for both romantic and platonic relationships. Developed by Boo Enterprises, Inc., the application distinguishes itself from mainstream dating apps by emphasizing compatibility matching over visual-first interfaces, targeting users seeking more substantive connections. The application's core functionality revolves around personality assessment and matching algorithms. Users complete detailed personality profiles that form the basis for compatibility scoring. The platform employs psychological principles to suggest potential matches, with filters for both dating and friendship purposes. Additional features include interest-based tagging, location-based discovery, and structured communication prompts designed to facilitate meaningful conversations beyond superficial openers. User experience demonstrates thoughtful design choices with a clean, intuitive interface that reduces the visual overload common in swipe-based applications. The onboarding process includes comprehensive personality assessment, while the main interface prioritizes compatibility percentages and shared interests over profile photographs. Real-world usage patterns indicate users typically spend more time reviewing compatibility metrics before initiating contact, resulting in higher-quality but potentially slower match connections compared to volume-focused platforms. User feedback consistently highlights the platform's effectiveness in facilitating genuine connections. Hazel Maudlin's September 5, 2025 review notes successful matching resulting in a relationship, attributing this to the personality-based system. Multiple reviewers including Chaz Parata-Bailey and Abi Johnson specifically praise the reduced overwhelming nature compared to Tinder or Bumble, with Homeflunky152's September 4, 2025 review emphasizing the more comfortable and relaxed user experience. The application demonstrates notable strengths in facilitating quality matches through psychological compatibility systems, though limitations include potentially slower match rates than volume-oriented competitors and dependency on user honesty in personality assessments. Ideal use cases involve users seeking substantive relationships rather than casual encounters, particularly those valuing psychological compatibility metrics over immediate visual impressions in partner selection.